One aspect
of this chapter that really stuck out to me was the possible reasons for the
mixed results of integrating technology into P-12 education. Specifically, the reason of “The intensity,
focus, or amount of professional development may not have adequately prepared
the teachers to effectively develop and implement lessons that fully support achievement of curriculum
standards” (p. 212). From what I have
seen, this is all too true. In most
cases, professional development days are never long enough for how much the
staff wants to accomplish. As educators,
we are constantly required to adjust our curriculum, and trying to change too
much at once leads to very little change overall. What we need to focus on is not drastic
changes, but effective, well-developed changes.
Establishing good foundations for integrating technology will allow us
to more easily integrate technology in a more complex way in the near future.
Additionally,
this chapter seemed to lament the use of technology for low-level tasks. I agree that such high-level technology needs
to be used to a higher capacity. We want
to make effective use of our technology so that we are not wasting our resources. That being said, there is still benefit to
using technology for low-level tasks.
With the near-constant access to technology, it seems that it is assumed
that students know how to use these tools for their low-level tasks. However, these assumptions can lead to
students not developing the basics skills such as effective and efficient
typing, research, and formatting documents.
So while we need to strive for higher-level uses, we need to make sure
we do not ignore the low-level basics.
No comments:
Post a Comment